What the research says
Cooling lowered jump performance in one laboratory study
One reason warmth matters around training is that laboratory cooling reduced muscle performance in the study below. In one laboratory study, eight men performed maximal rebound jumps after 60 minutes at 27, 20, 15 and 10 degrees C. Every cooler condition reduced jump flight time, average force and take-off velocity compared with 27 degrees C, and the effect grew with the degree of cooling. The authors concluded that a relatively low level of cooling was enough to lower muscle performance significantly (Oksa et al., 1997).
A later review by the same author describes this dose-dependent link, without figures in its abstract (Oksa, 2002).
Warming up helps, and the gap after it matters
A systematic review with meta-analysis of 32 high-quality studies found that warming up improved performance in 79% of the criteria examined, with little evidence that it was harmful (Fradkin et al., 2010). The authors note that few well-conducted randomised controlled trials exist. The catch is what happens next. A warm-up raises muscle temperature, and a long wait before the main effort lets that gain fade (Cowper et al., 2022; Silva et al., 2018).
In a study of ten male cyclists, a 15-minute sprint-based warm-up raised thigh muscle temperature by about 3 degrees C. During 30 minutes of recovery, deep muscle temperature fell by 1.3 degrees C with no heating. With water-perfused trousers heated to 43 degrees C it fell by only 0.12 degrees C, while electrically heated trousers at 40 degrees C gave a fall of 1.08 degrees C. The authors concluded that heating temperature was the main determinant of how well muscle temperature was maintained (Raccuglia et al., 2016). The study tested heated trousers, not unheated clothing.
Passive heat maintenance between warm-up and effort
Several trials tested passive heating or passive heat maintenance, meaning strategies such as heated garments or a survival jacket worn after a warm-up to slow cooling (Cowper et al., 2022; Silva et al., 2018; Russell et al., 2015). A meta-analysis of seven high-quality studies covering 85 well-trained athletes (78 men and 7 women) found that passive heating between an active warm-up and exercise increased peak power output in all studies, with an effect size of 0.54 (95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.91). The effect on overall exercise performance was only a favourable trend (Cowper et al., 2022). The authors note this rests on a limited number of well-conducted randomised trials and that more research is needed.
In a randomised study of 18 professional rugby union players, a simulated half-time in a survival jacket led to a smaller drop in core temperature than normal training attire (0.74% against 1.54%). Peak power was higher (5610 W against 5440 W) and the fastest sprint was 1.39% quicker (Russell et al., 2015).
A second rugby study, with 16 professionals, compared a heat-maintenance jacket, a short explosive jump routine, and both together. After 20 minutes of recovery, core temperature was lower with normal attire or the jump routine alone than with the jacket. The drop in peak power after the warm-up was smaller with the jacket combined with the jump routine than in any other condition, and repeated sprint performance was better too (West et al., 2016).
The same pattern appeared in swimming. Among 25 elite swimmers, a 30-minute transition wearing a tracksuit jacket with built-in heating elements plus a dry-land routine improved the race start by 1.5% and the 100 m time trial by 0.8%, with core temperature falling 0.2 degrees C rather than 0.5 degrees C (McGowan et al., 2017).
A systematic review of 30 team-sport articles reported that in the post-warm-up period heated garments could outperform simple rest (an improvement of 0.89%), and at half-time heated garments maintained sprint and jumping performance better. The same review concluded that for transitions longer than 15 minutes an active re-warm-up with short explosive tasks was needed (Silva et al., 2018).
The common thread is useful but limited: three of these trials used heated or specially designed jackets, so they show the effect of staying warm, not what a particular fleece garment would do.
Trapped air and fit
Researchers measuring clothing on thermal manikins give a controlled view of fit. In a workwear study using 3D scanning, total insulation followed a curved relationship with air-gap size and volume (R2 above 0.8). Insulation did not rise once air gaps exceeded about 30 mm, or once air gap volume reached 50 to 55 dm3. The highest insulation, about 0.23 m2 degrees C/W, came when the garment closely fitted the body without excessive tightness (Młynarczyk et al., 2025).
A fuller cut is not always warmer, then. A T-shirt study found that added fullness creating a flared drape can significantly reduce insulation and moisture vapour resistance when the manikin was walking or in wind, and small openings increased heat and moisture transfer further (Ho et al., 2011). A separate manikin study found that walking and wind increased the exchange of air between the clothing and the outside, which reduced insulation (Bouskill et al., 2002).
Movement and wind
A 1989 mathematical model estimated that insulation falls by about 20% during cycling and about 40% during walking, and that wind, posture and garment fit have predictable effects. It also noted that air motion affects water vapour passage more strongly than heat transfer (Lotens, 1989).
A manikin study at 10 degrees C backs this up. Walking at 0.37 and 0.77 m/s, or an air speed of 1.0 m/s, increased clothing ventilation and lowered insulation. The potential heat exchange from air movement reached up to 17 W/m2 for a one-layer ensemble and 161 W/m2 for a three-layer ensemble (Bouskill et al., 2002). Laboratory tests of fabrics (hot plates and a heated torso) add that air permeability only shows up as a factor with an air layer of at least 5 mm and a wind speed of at least 1.3 m/s (Torres et al., 2025). The same study notes that a standard thickness test applies high force; one sample's measured thickness differed by more than twofold between the standard and a lower-force method, which the authors describe as a risk of inaccurate data.
Fibre type and comfort
These studies used T-shirts, two with only 10 to 12 men, but they show that comfort depends on sweat handling as well as warmth. In 12 men cycling at 15 degrees C, a wool shirt held a higher torso skin temperature than cotton, viscose or polyester and was rated more comfortable after exercise (Abedin and DenHartog, 2024). In a hot-room test with ten men, rectal temperature was lower in the last 15 minutes with a polyester and elastane shirt than with cotton, and the synthetic shirt retained less sweat (De Sousa et al., 2014). A wear trial of T-shirts made from a soybean-protein-fibre and cotton blend, compared with cotton, concluded that moving water away from the skin, more than absorbing it, keeps the microclimate under a garment comfortable (Dai et al., 2008).
The earlier review adds a caution: in the cold, most reports do not support an effect of fabric on thermoregulation, though some do (Gavin, 2003). The same review reports that clothing construction did alter thermoregulation in the cold, with a fishnet construction giving greater heat dissipation (Gavin, 2003).
Key studies at a glance
| Study |
Who or what was tested |
Main finding |
| Cowper et al., 2022 |
Meta-analysis, 7 studies, 85 athletes |
Passive heating after a warm-up raised peak power (effect size 0.54); overall exercise performance showed only a favourable trend, based on a limited number of well-conducted trials |
| Russell et al., 2015 |
18 professional rugby players, survival jacket |
Smaller core temperature drop; peak power 5610 W vs 5440 W |
| West et al., 2016 |
16 professional rugby players, jacket and jumps |
Jacket plus jumps gave the smallest power decline |
| Raccuglia et al., 2016 |
10 male cyclists, heated trousers |
Deep muscle temperature fell 1.3 degrees C unheated vs 0.12 degrees C with 43 degrees C heating |
| McGowan et al., 2017 |
25 elite swimmers, heated jacket plus dry-land work |
100 m time trial improved by 0.8% |
| Oksa et al., 1997 |
8 men, jumps after cold exposure |
Lower temperatures reduced jump performance in a dose-dependent way |
| Młynarczyk et al., 2025 |
Thermal manikin, workwear fit |
No extra insulation beyond about 30 mm air gaps; workwear fitted closely without excessive tightness gave the highest insulation |
| Lotens, 1989 |
Model of multilayer clothing |
Insulation falls about 20% cycling, about 40% walking |
| Abedin and DenHartog, 2024 |
12 men cycling at 15 degrees C, T-shirts |
Wool held higher torso skin temperature than cotton, viscose or polyester |
What this means when choosing
The following is practical reasoning from the general findings, not a promise about any garment.
Pick the fit for the job
If fleece hoodie warmth is your priority, fit is one factor to weigh: the manikin findings above favour a close fit without excessive tightness over extra air space. A relaxed size can still make sense when you want room for another layer underneath, which is a separate consideration from the layering advice in the reviews.
Think in layers
Any layer you can easily pull on or take off fits the removable-layer approach suggested by Pascoe et al. (1994).
Warm-up, pauses and re-warm-up
In the rugby trial in 16 professional rugby union players that compared a jacket designed for heat maintenance, not an ordinary hoodie, a short explosive routine and both together, core temperature stayed higher with the jacket, and the smallest drop in power came from combining the jacket with the routine (West et al., 2016). The team-sport review concluded that for transitions longer than 15 minutes an active re-warm-up with short explosive tasks was needed, so a pause that long is a prompt to move again rather than to rely on a layer alone (Silva et al., 2018).
Expect warmth to change with activity and wind
Because insulation drops when you walk, cycle or stand in wind, a layer that feels cosy in the changing room may well feel cooler outdoors, because the studies above found insulation falls with walking and wind. Check the label for fibre content, since textile products made available on the EU market must be labelled or marked with their fibre composition in a durable, easily legible way under Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011; UK rules may differ and we have not reviewed them here.
Limits of the evidence
-
No hoodie trials. Our searches found no study of fleece insulation, fabric weight or hooded sweatshirts as such.
-
Heated jackets are not hoodies. Several passive heat trials used heated or survival jackets, and an unheated garment acts as a barrier to heat transfer (Gavin, 2003).
-
Elite athletes, few women in the meta-analysis. The rugby and swimming trials involved professional or elite competitors, the cycling trial used ten men, and the meta-analysis included 78 men and 7 women.
-
T-shirts and workwear. The fibre and fit studies used T-shirts or workwear on manikins or small groups of men.
-
Old and modelled data. Some sources, such as the 1989 model, are theoretical or dated, and the cold-exposure review abstract gives no numbers.
-
Small effects. Percentage differences in sprint or swim times are small and were measured in competition-style tests, so they say little about everyday gym sessions.
The Free Muscle product in this context
The Free Muscle Gym Hoodie is the garment this article was written around. Everything below comes from its product page. It is described as a heavyweight hoodie with a cotton-blend shell and a brushed-fleece interior, cut in an athletic fit and offered in sizes XS to XL. The page presents it as a warm-up layer for cold starts, time between sets or the walk home.
The page gives no measurements, air-gap data or insulation values, so we cannot say how its brushed-fleece interior or athletic fit relates to the manikin findings above, and we make no claim that this hoodie reproduces them or the heated-jacket results. The page suggests sizing up if you want room for layering. It does not state a fabric weight in GSM, the exact fibre percentages of the blend, or a size chart.
For care, the page says to machine wash cold at 30 degrees, inside out, and hang to dry to protect the fleece and print. You can see the wider Free Muscle merchandise range.
Frequently asked questions
Is a fleece hoodie warm enough for winter training?
It depends on temperature, wind and activity, because insulation falls with movement and wind (Lotens, 1989; Bouskill et al., 2002). The studies above found insulation falls with walking, cycling and wind, so the same hoodie will give less insulation outdoors while moving than standing still. No study tested a fleece-lined hoodie. See movement and wind.
Does a hoodie keep muscles warm after a warm-up?
Trials of heated or survival jackets found that staying warm after a warm-up helped maintain power. Clothing generally acts as a barrier to heat transfer (Gavin, 2003), but we found no study that tested whether an unheated hoodie has any comparable effect on power.
What makes fleece feel warm?
The authors of a manikin study state that air layers trapped within clothing contribute to thermal insulation (Bouskill et al., 2002). That study did not test fleece. The Free Muscle page describes a brushed-fleece interior but gives no insulation data; see trapped air and fit.
Is a looser hoodie warmer than a fitted one?
Not necessarily: in one manikin study a T-shirt cut with added fullness lost insulation when walking or in wind (Ho et al., 2011); see trapped air and fit.
Does fabric weight decide how warm a hoodie is?
We found no study of fabric weight in hooded sweatshirts. One review found that, in the cold, most reports do not support an effect of clothing fabric on thermoregulation although some do (Gavin, 2003); see fibre type and comfort.
Should I size up for layering?
The Free Muscle product page suggests sizing up for extra room for layering and staying true to size for a fitted look, so choose according to what you plan to wear beneath it.
How do cotton and polyester compare for sweaty sessions?
The studies used T-shirts, two with only 10 to 12 men. A hot-room test found less retained sweat with a polyester and elastane shirt than with cotton (De Sousa et al., 2014). The synthetic shirt was a form-fitted, moisture-wicking design tested at 33 degrees C, so this says little about a fleece-lined hoodie; see fibre type and comfort.
How should I wash a fleece-lined hoodie?
Follow the care label. The Free Muscle product page recommends a cold machine wash at 30 degrees, inside out, then hanging to dry to protect the fleece and print.
What about delivery and returns on the Free Muscle hoodie?
UK delivery is free and tracked, in plain packaging, and usually takes 2 to 5 working days; see the shipping information. Free Muscle's general returns page says unopened items in original packaging can be returned within 30 days, and apparel returns are covered separately in the refund policy.
Published by Free Muscle, which sells the product discussed in this article. Free Muscle sells research compounds and gym apparel online at freemuscle.co.uk. Research compounds are for laboratory research use only, for customers aged 18 or over, and are not medicines or food supplements and not for human consumption. Nothing in this article is medical advice. UK delivery is free and tracked, in plain packaging, with standard delivery taking 2 to 5 working days. Free Muscle's general returns page says unopened items in original packaging can be returned within 30 days; apparel returns are covered separately in the refund policy.
Sources
- Cowper G, Goodall S, Hicks K, Burnie L, Briggs M. The impact of passive heat maintenance strategies between an active warm-up and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022;14(1):154. doi:10.1186/s13102-022-00546-7 PMID 35964115
- Russell M, West DJ, Briggs MA, Bracken RM, Cook CJ, Giroud T, Gill N, Kilduff LP. A passive heat maintenance strategy implemented during a simulated half-time improves lower body power output and repeated sprint ability in professional Rugby Union players. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119374. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119374 PMID 25785393
- West DJ, Russell M, Bracken RM, Cook CJ, Giroud T, Kilduff LP. Post-warmup strategies to maintain body temperature and physical performance in professional rugby union players. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(2):110-5. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1040825 PMID 25925751
- Raccuglia M, Lloyd A, Filingeri D, Faulkner SH, Hodder S, Havenith G. Post-warm-up muscle temperature maintenance: blood flow contribution and external heating optimisation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(2):395-404. doi:10.1007/s00421-015-3294-6 PMID 26590591
- McGowan CJ, Pyne DB, Thompson KG, Raglin JS, Osborne M, Rattray B. Elite sprint swimming performance is enhanced by completion of additional warm-up activities. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(15):1493-1499. doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1223329 PMID 27631544
- Fradkin AJ, Zazryn TR, Smoliga JM. Effects of warming-up on physical performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(1):140-8. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c643a0 PMID 19996770
- Silva LM, Neiva HP, Marques MC, Izquierdo M, Marinho DA. Effects of warm-up, post-warm-up, and re-warm-up strategies on explosive efforts in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(10):2285-2299. doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0958-5 PMID 29968230
- Gavin TP. Clothing and thermoregulation during exercise. Sports Med. 2003;33(13):941-7. doi:10.2165/00007256-200333130-00001 PMID 14606923
- Pascoe DD, Bellingar TA, McCluskey BS. Clothing and exercise. II. Influence of clothing during exercise/work in environmental extremes. Sports Med. 1994;18(2):94-108. doi:10.2165/00007256-199418020-00003 PMID 9132923
- Młynarczyk M, Orysiak J, Jankowski J. Effect of workwear fit on thermal insulation: assessment using 3D scanning technology. Materials (Basel). 2025;18(9). doi:10.3390/ma18092098 PMID 40363601
- Ho C, Fan J, Newton E, Au R. The effect of added fullness and ventilation holes in T-shirt design on thermal comfort. Ergonomics. 2011;54(4):403-10. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.556260 PMID 21491282
- Abedin F, DenHartog E. Clothing impact on post-exercise comfort: skin-clothing physiology in transient environment. Ergonomics. 2024;67(8):1080-1096. doi:10.1080/00140139.2023.2281272 PMID 37960939
- De Sousa J, Cheatham C, Wittbrodt M. The effects of a moisture-wicking fabric shirt on the physiological and perceptual responses during acute exercise in the heat. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(6):1447-53. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.006 PMID 24768089
- Oksa J, Rintamäki H, Rissanen S. Muscle performance and electromyogram activity of the lower leg muscles with different levels of cold exposure. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(6):484-90. doi:10.1007/s004210050193 PMID 9202943
- Oksa J. Neuromuscular performance limitations in cold. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2002;61(2):154-62. doi:10.3402/ijch.v61i2.17448 PMID 12078963
- Lotens WA. The actual insulation of multilayer clothing. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989;15 Suppl 1:66-75. PMID 2609122
- Torres EG, Psikuta A, DenHartog E. Impact of garment construction and environmental factors on heat transfer. Int J Biometeorol. 2025;69(6):1495-1504. doi:10.1007/s00484-025-02907-6 PMID 40183815
- Bouskill LM, Havenith G, Kuklane K, Parsons KC, Withey WR. Relationship between clothing ventilation and thermal insulation. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002;63(3):262-8. doi:10.1080/15428110208984712 PMID 12173174
- Dai XQ, Imamura R, Liu GL, Zhou FP. Effect of moisture transport on microclimate under T-shirts. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(2):337-40. doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0628-z PMID 18071744
- European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products, Article 14. EUR-Lex